New planet is ‘about to destroy Earth’ and the clue is written on the pyramids

An author called David Meade is convinced that in September ‘death planet’ Nibiru is going to kill us all.

David, who wrote Planet X: The 2017 Arrival , believes the apocalypse will take place between September 20-23, and that clues are hidden in the Bible, and written on the pyramids.

The conspirator posted a video to YouTube in which he says: “It is very strange indeed that both the Great Sign of Revelation 12 and the Great Pyramid of Giza both point us to one precise moment in time – September 20 to 23, 2017.

“Is this the end of the Church Age and the transition to the Day of the Lord? There couldn’t be two greater witnesses.”

David thinks September spells the end for humankind (Image: Getty

David thinks that Planet X will become visible in the sky around the middle of September, and it’s then that disaster will strike.

Other conspiracy theorists have claimed that an unseen planet beyond Neptune – namely Nibiru – is going to destroy Earth.

As well as noting apparent mystic markings on the pyramids in Egypt, David’s prediction is largely based on the Bible passage Isaiah, Chapter 13 9-10, which says, “See, the Day of the Lord is coming – a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger – to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it.

“The Stars of Heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the Moon will not give its light.”

It’s not the first time people have been convinced that Nibiru is going to crash into our planet. In December 2015, people thought the same, and before that, in 2012, many suggested that the ancient Mayan people had foretold the apoclypse.

Of course, you shouldn’t worry. It is probably more likely that a nuclear war between North Korea and the US will kill us all off.

‘Safer’ thorium reactor trials could salvage nuclear power

A Dutch nuclear research institute is conducting the first experiment in close to five decades on molten-salt nuclear reactors based on thorium. Long hailed as a potential “safer” nuclear power, thorium reactor research could provide clean, affordable and “large-scale energy production.” That’s according to scientists from the Nuclear Research and Consulting Group (NRG) in Petten, Netherlands. If successful, the trials could result in a switch to next-gen thorium reactors, which are less likely to suffer meltdowns in comparison to their current uranium-based counterparts.

But, if it’s so safe and reliable why hasn’t thorium been used all along? Because (unlike uranium) it’s much harder to weaponize. As a result, it’s historically been sidelined by nations in search of both energy and a potential source of weapons-grade plutonium. The downside is that thorium is only slightly radioactive, making it harder to prepare than uranium. That’s where NRG’s next-gen reactor comes in.

You see, molten salt reactors melt down salts for fuel and then use that molten liquid to initiate the reaction that creates power. As part of its Salt Irrigation Experimentation (SALIENT), the NRG team will melt a sample of thorium fuel and batter it with neutrons to convert it into fissionable uranium. Future trials will involve temperature-resistant metal alloys and other materials that can sustain the heat inside the reactor. Ultimately, the researchers will have to figure out how to dispose of the waste created by thorium — which is substantially less toxic than that produced by a nuclear reactor.

With the fear of nuclear disasters (and nuclear war) on the rise, a switch to safer nuclear power couldn’t come at a better time. Not to mention the need to stave off climate change with clean sources of energy. Concerned nations (such as Switzerland and South Korea) are already moving away from nuclear power. But, this type of shift can take decades. And, with nuclear fusion trials potentially years away, thorium could provide the stopgap the world needs.

Why fentanyl could become the UK’s most dangerous drug

Bags of heroin, some laced with fentanyl seized in New York.

Fentanyl is starting to hit the headlines in the UK. The drug is not so well-known this side of the Atlantic but, if experiences in America are anything to go by, that will change. Sadly, fentanyl is a problem that is unlikely to be going away.

Fentanyl is a powerful pain-relieving drug, 50 times more potent than morphine, and was originally synthesised by Belgian chemist Paul Jannsen. The drug has medical applications, for example, in anaesthesia and relieving pain from major surgery or cancer.

The drug interacts with the same opioid receptors as morphine and heroin and is therefore called an opioid, even though it is chemically unrelated to opiates (drugs derived from opium poppies). Opioid receptors are part of the body’s reward pathway. Chemicals are released in our body to make us feel good as a reward for activities that help us survive and procreate, such as eating, drinking and sex. Increasing the presence of feelgood chemicals in our body is why opiates and opioids can be so powerfully addictive.

The body responds to repeated doses of opioids by desensitising the receptors. It means more opioid drugs have to be taken to achieve the same level of pain relief, when taken for medical reasons, or to reach the same high if taken recreationally. This is the development of tolerance. Those who have been taking opioids for a a longer period can cope with quantities that would kill new users or those who have lost their tolerance through a break in taking the drug.

For regular users, reducing the dose or stopping it means the body suddenly has receptors that need huge stimulation to relieve pain but no drug to stimulate them. Withdrawal from opioids can be agony. Every bone in the body hurts, you experience severe cold and goose bumps – hence the phrase “cold turkey”. With fentanyl the high is greater and so is the withdrawal. The desire to take more of the drug can be overwhelming.

Since the 1960s the fentanyl backbone has been modified and tinkered with to produce a huge number of variants that will differ in their interactions in the body. Some variants are more powerful sedatives than others and they differ in how long before they take effect. Carfentanil, for example, is thousandsof times more powerful than morphine and is used to tranquilise elephants. It is so powerful that those who work with elephants, park rangers etc., are required to have two people present if they are planning to use carfentanil darts. One person is there to fire the dart, and the other, sitting next to them with the antidote ready, in case of an accidental scratch. Incredibly there have been cases of human consumption of carfentanil, spiked in heroin or cocaine.

Because fentanyl interacts with the same receptors as morphine, the same antidote can be used. Naloxone, also marketed as Narcan, binds to opioid receptors but doesn’t stimulate them, it simply blocks the site where the opioid would bind and reverses all the opioid’s effects. However, fentanyl binds much more strongly to these receptors meaning a much larger dose of the antidote is needed. Emergency staff in the US have been known to administer a dozen or more doses of naloxone in cases of fentanyl overdose with no appreciable effect.

The intense and rapid high produced by fentanyl has made it attractive drug for recreational use. Cutting fentanyl with drugs like heroin and cocaine dramatically intensifies the potency and makes it far more addictive, benefiting drug dealers with very dependent consumers. It also dramatically increases in chances of dying. Just two milligrams of fentanyl can be fatal for an adult. Fentanyl has become a large part of America’s opioid crisis.

Fentanyl kills for the same reasons that opiates kill – they slow respiration until it stops. Death is by suffocation. Drugs administered by prescription or in hospital environments are quality controlled and used where the effects can be monitored and action taken if something goes wrong. By definition there is no such control in the illegal drugs trade. What is sold on the street could be anything from a little heroin, diluted with something fairly innocuous, to pure fentanyl.

It was recently reported that fentanyl has claimed the lives of at least 60 people in the UK over the last eight months. Sixty is a large number but it pales in comparison to the number of lives claimed by the drug in the US.

The process of making drugs is often frighteningly easy. For example, converting morphine to its far more addictive form heroin is an easy process that can be carried out with minimal knowledge and equipment. It is an attractive prospect for those wanting to make a quick profit. The biggest problem would be obtaining the raw materials, which in the case of morphine/heroin isn’t particularly difficult if you know where to look.

Fentanyl offers much greater profits per kilo than heroin but also presents greater problems. The chemistry needed to make fentanyl and its related compounds is not that difficult, at least on paper. Obtaining the raw materials is not the hardest part. The real problems occur in the practicalities of the chemical process needed to manufacture the drugs. These compounds are so potent that touching equipment contaminated with the drug can prove fatal. But, because it requires relatively specialised knowledge, the number of people producing fentanyl drugs illegally is quite small. However, because what they produce is so potent, a little bit goes a long way, and there is the potential to affect huge numbers of drug users.

On the positive side, if law enforcement can shut down just a few fentanyl factories it can dramatically reduce the number drug-related deaths. But even shutting down these factories is not straightforward. Drug raids have to be carefully planned. Going in all guns blazing can result in fentanyl powder being blown up into the air and officers needing emergency medical treatment. A police officer in the US was hospitalised simply because of brushing fentanyl powder off his uniform after an arrest.

There is no obvious quick fix to this growing problem. Reducing the number of opioid prescriptions may help lower the number of people who become addicted. Knowledge of the appalling effects of fentanyl may at least raise awareness but the chances of it deterring people from taking the drug seems a vain hope. One way of maybe reducing the number of deaths is making the opioid-blocker naloxone more widely available, but this is far from being a solution to the problem. Other ideas put forward have included making safer supplies of drugs available to users, at least temporarily. Leaving things as they are is not an option unless you want to see thousands more die. I sincerely hope I am wrong, but the future looks bleak.

Ultra-thin carbon nanotubes can separate salt from seawater

carbon nanotubes, global fresh water demand, water salt separation, sustainable development, Northeastern University, nanotube pores, water permeability, biological water transporters, synthetic water channel

Scientists have developed carbon nanotubes over 50,000 times thinner than a human hair which can separate salt from seawater, an advance that may help solve the global water crisis. Increasing demands for fresh water pose a global threat to sustainable development, resulting in water scarcity for four billion people, researchers said.

Current water purification technologies can benefit from the development of membranes with specialised pores that mimic highly efficient and water selective biological proteins. Scientists, including those from Northeastern University in the US, developed carbon nanotube pores that can exclude salt from seawater.

The team found that water permeability in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with diameters of 0.8 nanometre significantly exceeds that of wider carbon nanotubes. The nanotubes, hollow structures made of carbon atoms in a unique arrangement, are more than 50,000 times thinner than a human hair.

The super smooth inner surface of the nanotube is responsible for their remarkably high water permeability, while the tiny pore size blocks larger salt ions. “We found that carbon nanotubes with diameters smaller than a nanometre bear a key structural feature that enables enhanced transport,” said Ramya Tunuguntla, a postdoctoral researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the US.

“The narrow hydrophobic channel forces water to translocate in a single-file arrangement, a phenomenon similar to that found in the most efficient biological water transporters,” said Tunuguntla. Computer simulations and experimental studies of water transport through CNTs with diameters larger than one nanometre showed enhanced water flow, but did not match the transport efficiency of biological proteins and did not separate salt efficiently, especially at higher salinities.

The key breakthrough achieved by the LLNL team was to use smaller-diameter nanotubes that delivered the required boost in performance. “Carbon nanotubes are a unique platform for studying molecular transport and nanofluidics,” said Alex Noy principal investigator at LLNL.

“Their sub-nanometre size, atomically smooth surfaces and similarity to cellular water transport channels make them exceptionally suited for this purpose, and it is very exciting to make a synthetic water channel that performs better than
nature’s own,” said Noy. The research was published in the journal Science.